|Articles|September 1, 2003

Cover Story: LET'S COLLABORATE

Here's how to get more R.Ph.s to use their prescriptive authority, allowed in most states but lagging in practice

 

COVER STORY

LET'S COLLABORATE

Here's how to get more R.Ph.s to use their prescriptive authority, allowed in most states but lagging in practice

Magaly Rodriguez de Bittner, Pharm.D., CDE, has to know geography as well as pharmacy. As the coordinator for Giant Brands' diabetes education program, she works at grocery store pharmacies in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Virginia. Giant offers the same pharmacy-based diabetes education program in 160 stores, but the pharmacist's role is different in each state.

"Virginia lets pharmacists manage drug therapy by protocol with physicians," Rodriguez de Bittner explained. "I can perform clean waste tests, such as finger sticks, in the store. A mile away in Maryland, I cannot do testing at the store, but the patient can. The patient has to stick his or her own finger in front of me. The different practice acts make it difficult to institute collaborative drug therapy management chainwide. It is very confusing."

The American Pharmacists Association is just as confused. APhA counts 45 states that allow some sort of collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM). ASHP counts 39 and four pending (see table). Either way, each state has its own version of collaborative practice and collaborative practice protocols (CPPs).

 

List of states by statutory and regulatory authority

State
CDTM
Statute
Regulation
Practice setting
2002-2003 activity
Alabama
 
 
Pending
 
 
Alaska
X
 
X
All
New regulations
Arizona
X
X
X
Healthcare institutions: hospitals, staff models of a healthcare organization, nursing care institution community health center
 
Arkansas
X
X
X
All
 
California
X
X
 
All
 
Connecticut
X
X
 
Hospital inpatients
Act 02-41
Florida
X
X
 
All (by formulary)
 
Georgia
X
X
 
All
Hawaii
X
X
 
Licensed acute care hospitals and ambulatory settings
Act 256
Idaho
X
 
X
All
 
Illinois
X
 
 
All
 
Indiana
X
X
 
Acute care settings, private mental health institutions
 
Iowa
X
 
 
Retail and health-system pharmacies that meet eligibility requirements for the Medicaid Demonstration Project (see footnote)
 
Kansas
X
 
 
All
 
Kentucky
X
X
X
All
 
Louisiana
X
X
X
All
 
Maryland
X
X
 
Institutional facility (not included a nursing facility or an unrelated urgent care clinic)
Chapter 249
Massachusetts
 
Pending
 
 
 
Michigan
X
 
 
All
 
Minnesota
X
X
 
All
 
Mississippi
X
X
X
Institutional settings, outpatient settings (must be signed protocol for each patient)
 
Montana
X
X
 
All
 
Nebraska
X
X
 
All
 
Nevada
X
X
 
Licensed medical facilities: hospitals, hospices, managed care settings, home healthcare, skilled nursing facilities
 
New Jersey
 
Pending
 
 
 
New Mexico
X
X
 
All
 
New York
 
Pending
 
 
 
North Carolina
X
X
X
All
 
North Dakota
X
X
X
Institutional settings: hospitals, skilled nursing facilities swing bed facilities, clinics
 
Ohio
X
X
X
All
 
Oregon
X
 
X
All
 
Pennsylvania
X
X
 
Institutional settings
Act 102
Rhode Island
X
X
 
Hospitals (including outpatient clinics), nursing homes
 
South Carolina
X
X
 
All
 
South Dakota
X
X
 
All
 
Tennessee
X
 
 
All
 
Texas
X
X
X
All
 
Utah
X
X
 
All
 
Vermont
X
 
X
Institutional settings
 
Virginia
X
X
X
All
 
Washington
X
X
X
All
 
Wisconsin
X
 
 
All
 
Wyoming
X
X
X
All
 

 

Internal server error