In US counties where patients are experiencing high social vulnerability paired with a low primary care practitioner (PCP) density, pharmacy deserts were significantly more prominent. With an association between social vulnerability and chronic conditions as well, researchers’ findings highlighted the need for better access to both pharmacies and primary care in underserved communities.
“Nationally, 15.8 million (4.7%) of all people in the United States live in pharmacy deserts, spanning urban and rural settings in all 50 states. On average, communities that are pharmacy deserts have a higher proportion of people who have a high school education or less, have no health insurance, have low self-reported English ability, have an ambulatory disability, and identify as a racial or ethnic minority. While, on average, pharmacies are the most accessible health care setting in the United States, many people still do not have access to them,” wrote authors of a study published in Health Affairs Scholar.1
Key Takeaways
- Researchers aimed to address the association between high social vulnerability and pharmacy deserts across 3143 US counties.
- They found that 46% of all counties had at least 1 pharmacy desert.
- Researchers also identified primary care practitioner access and determined that underserved communities share a need for better overall health care access.
In the past 3 years alone, there have been major shake-ups on the corporate level for some of the largest pharmacy chains in the US. In 2021, CVS announced it would be closing about 900 stores, and in 2023, Rite Aid filed for bankruptcy, leading to 520 store closures within a 7-month span.2,3
“Retail pharmacy chains have been closing thousands of locations throughout the US, possibly playing a role in health care gaps. Similar to the concept of food deserts, areas in which medications are harder to obtain have been deemed pharmacy deserts,” wrote authors of a research letter published in JAMA Network Open.2
READ MORE: Increased Social Vulnerability Accounted for Decrease in Diabetes Control
In their research letter, the authors identified 3 main data points to address the association between social vulnerability and pharmacy access. First, they gathered data for pharmacy desert density, where a county was determined to have a high density if the number of pharmacy deserts per 1000 individuals was in the 80th percentile or higher.
Next, they used the social vulnerability index (SVI) to measure the extent of underserved communities across each county. And finally, they calculated the PCP (family medicine, general practice, general internal medicine, general pediatrics physicians) density by finding the number of PCPs per 10,000 individuals.
With 3143 counties included in the study, 46% had at least 1 pharmacy desert. Among the 1447 counties with at least 1 desert, 56.5% had low pharmacy desert density and 43.5% had high pharmacy desert density. Regarding PCP density in relation to pharmacy desert density, counties with higher pharmacy desert density were more likely to experience low PCP density, compared with areas of low pharmacy desert density.2
“Patients in higher SVI counties with a lower PCP density had a 30% to 40% higher likelihood to reside in regions with pharmacy deserts. These findings highlight how disparities compound to create barriers to access basic health care,” they wrote.