150 years of American Pharmacy: Protection against the 'ignorant and incompetent'

Not surprisingly, pharmacists were greatly concerned with the intrusion of state and local governments into the pharmacy profession and the potential overlap of pharmacy regulations. The cities of Baltimore and New York were quick to introduce pharmacy regulation and attempt to establish boards of pharmacy. And the states of New York, Rhode Island, Maryland, New Jersey, and Illinois were not far behind. Still, as Druggists' Circular, the antecedent of Drug Topics, argued in January 1872, "it is right that the public be protected against the ignorant and incompetent."

In a discussion of a proposed New York board of pharmacy law, Druggists' Circular offered its support for the bill and noted some general principles about the board of pharmacy movement. In the bill, Druggists' Circular hoped, "exorbitant fees should be abolished," the magazine insisted, though recognizing that it was not inappropriate to "make pharmaceutical education compulsory." In an age when many pharmacists still grew up in drugstores and apprenticed to learn the trade, some big changes were clearly afoot.

The biggest question was whether pharmacists could come together to support the development of pharmacy boards. In New York, "Steps have been taken to unite all pharmaceutical interests," Druggists' Circular remarked, "so that a simple serviceable law shall be placed before the legislature." In New York, however, uniting disparate groups has never been an easy process. It would take another 12 years for the Empire State to finally create its own board of pharmacy.

Internal server error